Jimmy Reed and Cindy Reed, Plaintiffs-appellees, v. Shell Offshore Inc., Defendant-appellant, 879 F.2d 151 (5th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseJ. Daniel Picou, Bailey & Leininger, Metairie, La., for defendant-appellant.
Craig J. Robichaux, John W. Anthony, Talley, Anthony, Hughes & Knight, Bogalusa, La., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Robert F. Collins, Judge.
(Opinion May 15, 1989, 5th Cir. 1989, 872 F.2d 680)
ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
Before REAVLEY, WILLIAMS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:
The Court has considered the motions for rehearing filed by both parties. We deny the relief requested in those motions but correct our prior opinion in two particulars.
First, our jurisdiction is founded in this offshore platform case not upon diversity but upon the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act ("OCSLA"), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1331, et seq. Thus, we rely on Louisiana law because of its incorporation by OCSLA as surrogate federal law. We erroneously stated in the original opinion that we are "Erie-bound." In this case, the technical basis for jurisdiction has no effect on our dependence upon Louisiana law. See Knapp v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 781 F.2d 1123, 1129 (5th Cir. 1986).
Second, the concluding sentence in the panel opinion is revised to reverse and remand for a new trial limited to the issue of the extent of liability pursuant to the cause of action stated in Louisiana Civil Code Article 2317, i.e. submission to the jury of an issue on the degrees of causation or fault of Reed, Shell and B & D.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
