Ivey June Sweezy, Petitioner-appellant, v. Gary Dixon, Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the Stateof North Carolina, Respondents-appellees, 878 F.2d 379 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseIvey June Sweezy, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ivey June Sweezy seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sweezy v. Dixon, C/A No. 88-181-SH-C (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
DISMISSED.
We deny appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. The issues in this appeal are not complex and the appeal does not present exceptional circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel. Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 163 (4th Cir. 1984)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
