United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Keith A. Campbell, Defendant-appellant, 878 F.2d 1431 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseKeith Anthony Campbell, appellant pro se.
John C. Belcher, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Keith A. Campbell appeals the denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in which he challenged the dismissal of his second 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as successive. We agree with the district court that Campbell has presented no basis for relief under Rule 60(b) and therefore find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310 (4th Cir. 1982). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
