Unpublished Disposition, 876 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseRosa Patricia VON LUDWITZ, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES Of America, et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 88-1824.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted* April 13, 1989.Decided June 6, 1989.
Before MERRILL, EUGENE A. WRIGHT and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Petitioner Rosa Patricia Quinonez de Hutchings von Ludwitz appeals from the district court's order denying her petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We affirm.
The petition in the district court sought to restore the name of the petitioner's daughter, in the custody of third parties, to the name that the petitioner originally gave her. The petition did not request the return of her daughter.
Federal habeas corpus is not available to challenge or claim parental rights or child custody. See Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services Agency, 458 U.S. 502, 511 (1981). Further, children in foster and adoptive homes are not deemed to be held in custody. See id. at 510-11. The writ of federal habeas corpus does not provide an avenue of relief for the petitioner's claim.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.