Unpublished Disposition, 875 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 875 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1989)

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-2795.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 10, 1989.Decided May 24, 1989.

Before HUG, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM* 

David Wright appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") on the issue of the company's liability to Wright under an auto insurance policy issued to him. Wright alleges that the policy's uninsured motorist section covers injuries he sustained when beaten and robbed at gunpoint after being stopped in his car. We affirm.

Under California law, any uninsured motorist claim for damages involving an unknown owner or driver must offer as a prerequisite to recovery proof that the injury suffered arose out of physical contact between the insured and the uninsured's car. Cal.Ins.Code Sec. 11580.2(b) (West 1988). See Orpustan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 103 Cal. Rptr. 919, 922-233 (Cal.1972); see also Barnes v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 230 Cal. Rptr. 800, 801 (Cal.Ct.App.1986); Boyd v. Inter-Insurance Exch., 186 Cal. Rptr. 443, 444-46 (Cal.Ct.App.1982).

Wright has not satisfied this well-established principle of California law. He concedes that at no time did the assailants' car come into physical contact with him or his truck. His claim, consequently, fails.

Wright's argument that two California appellate cases have modified the physical contact standard is unpersuasive. The first case, Nationwide Ins. Co. v. Munoz, 245 Cal. Rptr. 324 (Cal.Ct.App.1988), was withdrawn from circulation by the California Supreme Court and therefore may not be cited or otherwise relied upon. Cal.R.Court Rules 976(c) (2), 977(a) (West 1988). The second case, Inter-Insurance Exch. v. Lopez, 47 Cal. Rptr. 834 (Cal.Ct.App.1965), is inapplicable. In Lopez, the California Supreme Court held that an unknown vehicle which strikes a second vehicle that, in turn, strikes the insured vehicle satisfies the physical contact requirement. Id. at 836-37. In Wright's case, neither the uninsured car nor a car struck by it came into contact with Wright or his truck. Lopez does not apply.

The district court order is AFFIRMED.

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.