United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. George Lovell Hutto, Jr., Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. George Lovell Hutto, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 873 F.2d 1441 (4th Cir. 1989)

Nothing in this opinion or in the district court's orders should be construed to prohibit Hutto from bringing another motion for production of documents at government expense. Hutto must, however, identify with as much specificity as possible the documents sought and must give specific and detailed reasons why the documents are needed

We note that Hutto has filed a lengthy informal brief in these appeals containing documents that quite clearly were not before the district court. To the extent that the material submitted with the informal brief was not before the district court, we have not considered it. We also note that a number of the materials and allegations in the informal brief relate to challenges to Hutto's conviction. Such matters should be brought in the district court in the first instance pursuant to the post-conviction procedures of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, on forms available from the district court for that purpose. Accordingly, we decline to address them in the first instance in these appeals. Our decision in this regard is without prejudice to Hutto raising his claims in a properly filed Sec. 2255 motion