Melvin E. Swanson, Sr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Delaney; Jim Baine; William A. Dudley; Davidhawley; Garry Eller; Aaron Johnson; Danjohnson; David Bobo; Dottie Harris,defendants-appellees, 865 F.2d 1259 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 865 F.2d 1259 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: Nov. 29, 1988. Decided: Dec. 23, 1988

Melvin E. Swanson, Sr., appellant pro se.

Lacy Herman Thornburg (Office of the Attorney General); Allan R. Gitter (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice), for appellees.

Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Melvin E. Swanson, a North Carolina inmate, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a number of employees of the Department of Correction alleging violations of his constitutional rights. He appeals an order of the district court which denied him a discovery conference.

This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to review final orders of the district court. An order is final if it "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). Swanson's appeal is taken from neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory order. His objection to the denial of a discovery conference can be pursued only on appeal from the final judgment. North Carolina Association of Black Lawyers v. North Carolina Board of Law Examiners, 538 F.2d 547 (4th Cir. 1976); Cochran v. Birkel, 651 F.2d 1219 (6th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1152 (1982).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.