Ping L. Ku, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Allied-signal Inc., Defendant-appellee, 865 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 865 F.2d 1258 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted: Nov. 30, 1988. Decided: Dec. 30, 1988. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Feb. 3, 1989

Ping L. Ku, appellant pro se.

Donald Lester Creach, Thomas J. Flaherty (Hunton & Williams), for appellee.

Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Ping L. Ku appeals from the district court's order denying relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ku v. Allied-Signal Inc., C/A No. 87-0567 (E.D. Va. July 20, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.