Robert S. Creamer, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Richard B. Danks, Etc., Defendant, Appellee, 863 F.2d 1037 (1st Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseEdward R. Benjamin, Jr., with whom Jonathan S. Piper and Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, Portland, Me., were on brief, for plaintiffs, appellants.
Lawrence S. Delaney with whom Jeffrey M. White and Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith & Lancaster, Portland, Me., were on brief, for defendant, appellee.
Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, TIMBERS,* Senior Circuit Judge, and TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
After consideration of the briefs, arguments and record, we affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate's careful and lucid opinion. 700 F. Supp. 1169.
We add that, of course, the absolute privilege for statements made in the course of judicial proceedings bars not only plaintiffs' defamation claim, but all the causes of action alleged against defendant, including negligence for professional malpractice. Dunbar v. Greenlaw, 152 Me. 270, 128 A.2d 218 (1956) (judicial proceeding privilege bars malpractice against certifying physician in insanity proceeding). See also Sriberg v. Raymond, 544 F.2d 15, 16 (1st Cir. 1976) (judicial proceedings privilege results in "freedom from civil liability").
AFFIRMED.
Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
