United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Linley Vernon Tate, Sr., Defendant-appellant, 862 F.2d 871 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseLinley Vernon Tate, Sr., appellant pro se.
Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr. (Office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellee.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Linley Vernon Tate, Sr. appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tate, CR. No. 85-36; C/A No. 87-365-R (W.D. Va. June 28, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
