United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Timothy Wallace, Defendant-appellant, 859 F.2d 151 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseTimothy Wallace, appellant pro se.
Charles Preston Scheeler, Office of U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Wallace appeals the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for a reduction of his sentence. Because we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, we affirm its judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
