Armond Craig Whitlock, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 854 F.2d 1318 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseArmond Craig Whitlock, appellant pro se.
Leonard Edwin Cohen, Rosemary A. Gladue, Frank, Bernstein, Conaway & Goldman, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Armond Craig Whitlock appeals from the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment in plaintiff's action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000-e, et. seq. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whitlock v. Westinghouse, C/A No. 87-1863 (D. Md. March 9, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
