Unpublished Disposition, 852 F.2d 572 (9th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseJirik PAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.GENERAL ATOMIC (Now GA Technologies), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-6128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 7, 1988.Decided June 30, 1988.
Before WALLACE, TANG, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
Parez appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of GA Technologies, Inc. The district court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
Summary judgment was granted on the basis that there was no material dispute of the fact that GA Technologies is not the same entity as General Atomic Company and is not a successor in interest to that entity. No triable issue of fact was raised by Parez. Thus, the district court did not err in holding that GA Technologies was not a proper party to this action.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
