Norris Leo Dangler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Montgomery County, Maryland, Defendant-appellee, 852 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 852 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: May 23, 1988. Decided: July 21, 1988

Norris Leo Dangler, appellant pro se.

Karen Louise Federman (Katz, Frome, Slan & Bleecker, PA), for appellee.

Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Norris Leo Dangler appeals from the district court's order construing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as a habeas corpus petition and denying relief for failure to exhaust state remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of probable cause to appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dangler v. Montgomery County, Maryland, C/A No. 87-580-R (D. Md. Jan. 25, 1988). The district court's order is modified in one respect: Dangler's claims are dismissed without prejudice and he may raise them again in the district court when he has exhausted his state remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2106.

The defendant's motion to dismiss this appeal is denied. We note that the district court's failure to issue a certificate of probable cause to appeal is not a ground for dismissal of the appeal, as the certificate can be granted by this Court if appropriate. 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.