United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Joseph Norman Honeycutt, Defendant-appellants.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Clifford David Carlyle, Defendant-appellants, 850 F.2d 690 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseLionel S. Lofton (Parks N. Small, on brief), for appellants.
J. Robert Haley, Assistant United States Attorney (Vinton D. Lide, United States Attorney, on brief), for appellee.
Before K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT R. MERHIGE, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Norman Honeycutt and Clifford David Carlyle appeal the decision of the district court denying their motion to suppress evidence seized from the automobile in which they were stopped on March 5, 1987. A review of the record, the briefs, and oral argument reveals that the thorough, well-reasoned opinion of the district court is without error. We therefore affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Honeycutt, CR-87-00074 (D.S.C. May 28, 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
