Sidney Faison, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Northampton County Department of Social Services; James P.clark; Harriet Beasley, Defendants-appellees, 850 F.2d 689 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseSidney Faison, appellant pro se.
Charles Julian Vaughan, II, for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before H.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's final order granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 and 1983 is without merit.* Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Faison v. Northampton Social Services, C/A No. 85-89-CIV-2 (E.D.N.C. July 17, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
As the appeal was filed prior to entry of a final judgment as to the amount of attorney's fees, this Court's review in this case is limited to the grant of summary judgment. See Cassidy v. Virginia Carolina Veneer Corp., 652 F.2d 380, 383 (4th Cir. 1981)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
