Herbert Harris, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Norfolk, Virginia; Norfolk Redevelopment Andhousing Authority; S. Cope, and All Otherdefendants Claiming Title to Certainlands Allegedly Heldunlawfully,defendants-appellees, 849 F.2d 605 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseHerbert Harris, appellant pro se.
Philip Richard Trapani, City Attorney; Harold Phillip Juren, Deputy City Attorney; Francis Nelson Crenshaw, Crenshaw, Ware & Johnson, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Harris appeals from the district court's denial of Harris's post judgment motion seeking reconsideration and/or a new trial. The district court found that Harris had failed to present circumstances which would warrant disturbing the judgment entered against him. We agree and accordingly find no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of Harris's motion. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310 (4th Cir. 1982).
We dispense with oral argument because this appeal is frivolous.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
