E.z. Bell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles M. Creecy, Superintendent; Dr. Sutton, Physician;dr. Greer, Psychologist, Defendants-appellees, 849 F.2d 604 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseE.Z. Bell, appellant pro se.
Lucien Capone, III, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
E.Z. Bell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Creecy, C/A No. 86-1135-CRT (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
