Unpublished Dispositionjames Haynes, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Jabe, Defendant-appellee, 849 F.2d 1473 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore LIVELY and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This pro se plaintiff appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed the complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court entered November 23, 1987, for the reasons stated by the district court. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The motion for counsel is denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
