Unpublished Dispositiongregory L. Oakley, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. George Wilson, et al., Defendants-appellees, 848 F.2d 193 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore MERRITT and CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment sua sponte dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for frivolity. The appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the certified record and the plaintiff's brief, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Plaintiff claimed that defendants have deprived him of his liberty interest in parole by failing to expunge inaccurate information from his presentence report.
Upon consideration, we affirm the district court's judgment pursuant to Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, because plaintiff lacks a constitutionally protected liberty interest in parole and he has not yet been injured by the deprivation of any state-created interest. See Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal Complex, 442 U.S. 1 (1979); Pruett v. Levi, 622 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1980) (per curiam).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
