Unpublished Dispositionblount National Bank, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Elmer D. Heist, Defendant-appellant, 848 F.2d 188 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 848 F.2d 188 (6th Cir. 1988) May 19, 1988

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, and KEITH and RYAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This defendant appeals the district court's judgment entered against him following a bench trial in an action claiming a breach of a loan agreement. The court also rejected the defendant's counterclaims. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the parties' briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly entered judgment for the plaintiff. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment entered May 15, 1987, for the reasons stated by the district court. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.