George Paul Laroque, Plaintiff-appellant, v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons; Butner Federal Correctionalinstitution; Sam Samples; Gerri Levister,defendants-appellees, 848 F.2d 185 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseGeorge Paul LaRogue, appellant pro se.
James Gordon Carpenter (office of the U.S. Attorney), for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit.* Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. LaRoque v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, C/A No. 87-198-CRT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
We note that interference with one letter is an isolated incident and does not state a claim of constitutional magnitude
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
