United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Bartehqua Nimely Wisseh, Defendant-appellant, 846 F.2d 75 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 846 F.2d 75 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted: Feb. 23, 1988. Decided: April 8, 1988

Bartehqua Nimely Wisseh, appellant pro se.

Kenneth Wayne McAllister, United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is without merit. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wisseh, C/A No. 86-753-S (M.D.N.C. June 23, 1987).

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.