Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert H. Wallace, Defendant-appellant, 842 F.2d 333 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore NATHANIEL R. JONES and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This pro se prisoner appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for correction of sentence filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon consideration of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed.
The district court properly denied defendant's motion because prosecution on more than one count under 18 U.S.C. § 1202(a) (1) was justified because different weapons were kept in separate places. Thus, upon conviction, separate consecutive sentences were appropriate.
The district court's judgment is accordingly affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
