Unpublished Dispositionjerry D. Ferrell, Petitioner-appellant, v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Supt., Respondent-appellee, 842 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseBefore NATHANIEL R. JONES and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This pro se petitioner appeals a judgment of the district court which dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He now moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon review of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
For the reasons stated in the district court's orders of February 25, 1987 and July 15, 1987, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby granted and the final judgment entered July 16, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
