Unpublished Disposition, 842 F.2d 1294 (9th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseVictor W. BROAD, Lead Underwriter for Those CertainUnderwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing toPolicy Nos. HJE1067 and OM002370,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.RAINBOW BRIDGE, INC., a California corporation; RainbowTours, Inc., a California corporation, and AlwynN. Jarreau, an individual, Defendants- Appellees.
No. 86-6715.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted: March 8, 1988.Decided: March 18, 1988.
Before PREGERSON, WIGGINS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
ORDER*
Reviewing the jury verdict in favor of the appellees under the substantial evidence standard, we conclude that there was sufficient evidence before the jury that reasonable minds could accept as adequate to support their conclusion. Transgo, Inc. v. Ajac Transmission Parts Corp., 768 F.2d 1001, 1014 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1059 (1986). Although the jury instructions were contested below, because the appellant has not sought appellate review of the correctness of these instructions, we decline to now reach that issue. Additionally, the jury's damage award is supported by substantial evidence and, accordingly, will not be disturbed. Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, 762 F.2d 753, 760 (9th Cir. 1985).
Finally, we uphold the trial court's award of pre-judgment interest because it does not amount to an abuse of discretion. United States Dominator v. Factor Ship Robert E. Resoff, 768 F.2d 1099, 1106 (9th Cir. 1985).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Circuit Rule 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
