Earl Wayne Odom, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Perry Martin, Defendant-appellee, 842 F.2d 1291 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseEarl Wayne Odom, appellant pro se.
Jack Benjamin Crawley, Jr., for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order dismissing Odom's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. We therefore affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Odom v. Martin, C/A No. 86-1294-CIV (E.D.N.C. July 27, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
