Charles Curtis Hairston, Petitioner-appellant, v. Raymond Hayes, Superintendent; Attorney General of Northcarolina, Respondents-appellees, 842 F.2d 1290 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseCharles Curtis Hairston, appellant pro se.
Barry Steven McNeill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, we deny the related motion for release. Hairston v. Hayes, C/A No. 86-923-WS (M.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 1987).
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
