Henry F. Adkins, Petitioner-appellant, v. Lacy Thornburg, Attorney General of North Carolina;superintendent, Piedmont Correctional Center,respondents-appellees, 842 F.2d 1289 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseHenry F. Adkins, appellant pro se.
Barry Steven McNeill, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before SPROUSE, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order construing plaintiff's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and refusing relief is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Adkins v. Thornburg, C/A 87-178-C-G (M.D.N.C. September 30, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
