Unpublished Disposition, 841 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 841 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1988)

Jose Benedicto GIRON-GONZALEZ, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 86-7653.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 11, 1988.Decided March 4, 1988.

Before ALDISERT,**  WALLACE and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

This is a petition for review of the denial of petitioner's application for withholding of deportation and asylum. The parties do not dispute the underlying facts; the case is not materially distinguishable from Artiga Turcios v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 829 F.2d 720 (9th Cir. 1987). Thus, Giron-Gonzalez has shown a clear probability of persecution and is eligible for withholding of deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1253(h) (1987). See Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 107 S. Ct. 1207, 1209 (1987). We reverse the denial of the petition for withholding of deportation.

Because we have concluded that Giron-Gonzalez has met the more stringent clear probability standard, he has also met the well-founded fear standard sufficient to support his asylum application. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (1987). Appellant may wish to seek asylum, in addition to prohibition of deportation, in order to seek permanent resident status after one year. 8 U.S.C. § 1159(b) (1987). Therefore, we remand his asylum claim to the Attorney General so that he may exercise his discretion. Id. at Sec. 1158(a); Artiga Turcios, 829 F.2d at 724.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


WALLACE, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

Because I believe that Artiga is materially distinguishable, I respectfully dissent. In Artiga, we concluded that Artiga Turcios who (1) had been in the army, (2) had been one of three men from his company who had received specialized combat training consisting of a two-month course on survival and how to attack the army, (3) had participated in numerous battles with guerrillas both before and after the training and estimated that at least fifteen guerrillas were killed in these battles, and (4) had seen guerrillas in his neighborhood seeking to recruit him to the guerrilla cause established a "clear probability" of persecution and was therefore entitled to withholding of deportation. Artiga, 829 F.2d at 723-24.

In contrast to Artiga Turcios, Giron-Gonzalez has merely been in the army. He has received no specialized combat training other than a self-described fifteen day "commando course" in which his entire company went without food and water. There is no indication that any guerrillas were killed in the battles his unit fought. Certain guerrillas did come to his home and ask to speak with "Giron-Gonzalez" but it is not clear that they wished to speak with him since that was also his brother's name. Moreover, the guerrillas made no threats or statements indicating they intended to abduct or harm "Giron-Gonzalez." The fact that the guerrillas visited his home was not unusual in that his family's home is located on the outskirts of town and that his family sometimes provides the guerrillas food and water. Given that deportation does not require Giron-Gonzalez to return to his hometown, see Quintanilla-Ticas v. INS, 783 F.2d 955, 957 (9th Cir. 1986), it is not objectively reasonable to conclude that the guerrillas will seek out an unskilled, low-ranking former member of the army who has the combat experience he described. Giron-Gonzalez is essentially in no different position than hundreds, or perhaps thousands, of other individuals who are currently or have been in the army.

Because the BIA's conclusion that Giron-Gonzalez failed to meet the "well-founded" fear standard applicable to an asylum request was correct, a fortiori the BIA was also correct in denying his request for withholding of deportation. I would deny the petition.

 **

Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.