Richard Edward Wiggins, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Mary Sue Terry, Attorney Generalof Virginia; Ellis B. Wright, Jr., Warden,respondents-appellees, 840 F.2d 12 (4th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 840 F.2d 12 (4th Cir. 1988) Submitted Dec. 21, 1987. Decided Feb. 16, 1988

Richard Edward Wiggins, appellant pro se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:


A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that an appeal from the order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 would be without merit. Several of Wiggins' claims are successive and the rest were withheld from his previous habeas corpus applications without adequate justification. The current petition is thus clearly an abuse of the writ. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. Wiggins v. Murray, C/A No. 87-7-R (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1987).

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.