Robert W. Hart, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Charles Miller, Wv Department of Highways, Paul Mcmahan, Wvdepartment of Highways, Elwood Penn, Wv Department Ofhighways, Paul Parker, Jr., Kathleen Berry, Wv Department Ofhighways, Susan Tucker, Prosecuting Attorney, Monongaliacounty, Clark Frame, Richard Neely, for Frank Depond, Wvstate Supreme Court, Defendants-appellees, 838 F.2d 466 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseRobert W. Hart, appellant pro se.
Nancy Jean Aliff, West Virginia Department of Highways, for Appellees Miller, McMahan, Penn, and Berry, George Baker Armistead, Baker & Armistead, for appellee Neely.
Paul Parker, Jr., Susan Tucker, Clark Frame, Appellees.
S.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.* Hart v. Miller, C/A No. 86-851-2 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 10, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
The supplemental brief submitted with appellant's motion to allow a formal brief has been filed and considered in the disposition of this appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
