Unpublished Dispositionvernon E. Rodman, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Harry A. Russell, Supt., et al., Defendants-appellees, 837 F.2d 476 (6th Cir. 1988)

ORDER

This pro se plaintiff appeals a judgment of the district court which dismissed his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff now moves for the appointment of counsel. Upon review of the record and the brief submitted by plaintiff, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

For the reasons stated in the district court's orders of October 19, 1983, October 10, 1984, and September 1, 1987, the motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied. Furthermore, the district court's final judgment entered September 1, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.