Heeney, Armstrong & Heeney, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Norris Leo Dangler, Defendant-appellant, 836 F.2d 546 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseNorris Leo Dangler, appellant pro se.
Heeney, Armstrong & Heeney, for appellee.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Norris L. Dangler appeals from the order of the district court remanding this contract action to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland. The district court's order of remand is not reviewable on appeal. 28 U.S.C Sec. 1447(d); Mason v. Callaway, 554 A. 22d 129, 130 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 877 (1977). This Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to hear Dangler's appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively and dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
