Unpublished Dispositionjohn R. Haynes, Jr., Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee, 836 F.2d 1347 (6th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 836 F.2d 1347 (6th Cir. 1988) Jan. 12, 1988

Before MERRITT, CORNELIA R. KENNEDY, and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

This pro se federal prisoner appeals the district court's judgment denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon consideration of the record and the briefs, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Petitioner argued that his guilty plea was invalid due to technical violations of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court concluded that the colloquy between petitioner and the court was sufficient to satisfy Rule 11 and denied the motion.

Upon review, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons stated in its order of May 11, 1987. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.