Florida Power & Light Co., a Florida Corp., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., a Pennsylvania Corp. Qualifiedto Do Business in Florida, Defendant-appellee, 835 F.2d 817 (11th Cir. 1988)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - 835 F.2d 817 (11th Cir. 1988) Jan. 15, 1988

Alvin B. Davis, Nancy Swerdlow, Steel Hector & Davis, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

R. Benjamine Reid, Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings, Womack, Carlson & Kniskern, P.A., Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Joe Eaton, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FAY, Circuit Judge, PECK*  and GODBOLD** , Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Florida Power & Light sued Westinghouse asserting a breach of warranty claim and a negligence claim, arising out of an undertaking by Westinghouse to design, manufacture and furnish nuclear generating plant equipment for FPL's Turkey Point plant in Dade County, Florida. The court granted a partial summary judgment in favor of Westinghouse on the negligence claim and denied partial summary judgment on the breach of warranty claim.

The case is before us on an interlocutory appeal by FPL under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from the summary judgment for Westinghouse on the negligence claim.

This court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida two issues:

(1) Whether Florida law permits a buyer under a contract for goods to recover economic losses in tort without a claim for personal injury or property damage to property other than the allegedly defective goods.

(2) If Florida law precludes recovery for economic loss in tort without a claim for personal injury or property damage to other property, whether this rule should be applied retroactively in this case.

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 785 F.2d 952 (11th Cir. 1986).

The Supreme Court of Florida has answered the first question "no" and the second question "yes." Florida Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 510 So. 2d 899 (Fla.1987). This decision, appropriately made by the highest court of the state in this diversity case, controls our decision.

The partial summary judgment in favor of Westinghouse on the negligence claim is AFFIRMED.

 *

Honorable John W. Peck, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

 **

See Rule 34-2(b), Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.