Unpublished Dispositiondemetrious Favors, Petitioner-appellant, v. Dale Foltz, Respondent-appellee, 833 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1987)

Before ENGEL and CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judges and POTTER, District Judge.^* 

ORDER

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

Petitioner filed this action for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 attacking the constitutionality of a 1967 murder conviction. The district court ultimately denied the relief sought and dismissed the petition. This appeal followed the denial of a motion to reconsider. On appeal, the parties have briefed the issues.

Upon consideration, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion and order of November 14, 1986. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.