Said M. Karara, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James P. Jones, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, P.a.,defendants-appellees, 833 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseSaid M. Karara, appellant pro se.
Larry Benson Kirksey, Woodward, Miles & Flannagan, PC, Wade Wallihan Massie, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, D. Stan Barnhill, William Beverly Poff, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, for appellees.
Before ERVIN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing Karara's action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Karara v. Jones, C/A No. 86-0239-A (W.D. Va., May 5, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.