Reginald Slade, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Clay Hester, Sheriff, Major Rice, C.e. Chuck Moore, Captain,defendants- Appellees, 833 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseReginald Slade, appellant pro se.
Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Slade v. Hester, C/A No. 86-953-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 1987).*
AFFIRMED.
We also find no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion to amend the judgment brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. Slade's allegations in his motion did not require the court to reconsider its order dismissing the complaint without prejudice
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
