James H. Gilbert, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Barry Bach, Individually and As Partner of Smith, Somerville& Case, Phillips P. O'shaughnessy, Individually and Aspartner of Smith, Somerville & Case, Smith, Somerville &case, a Partnership; Bill J. Sparks, Individually and Aspresident of United Laboratories of America, Inc., Johnforbes, Individually and As Vice President of Unitedlaboratories of America, Inc., and United Laboratories Ofamerica, Inc. a Texas Corporation, Defendant-appellee.james H. Gilbert, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Barry Bach, Individually and As Partner of Smith, Somerville& Case, Phillips P. O'shaughnessy, Individually and Aspartner of Smith, Somerville & Case, Smith, Somerville &case, a Partnership, Bill J. Sparks, Individually and Aspresident of United Laboratories of America, Inc., Johnforbes, Individually and As Vice President of Unitedlaboratories of America, Inc., and United Laboratories Ofamerica, Inc. a Texas Corporation, Defendant-appellee, 833 F.2d 1004 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseJames H. Gilbert, appellant pro se.
James M. Kramon, Phillip Melton Andrews, Kramon & Graham, Pa., for appellees.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record discloses that these appeals from the district court's orders (i) granting summary judgment to four defendants and (ii) dismissing two defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction are without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Gilbert v. Bach, C/A No. 85-3114 (D. Md., Oct. 30, 1986; Dec. 4, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
