Unpublished Dispositiondouglas Owen Blakely, Petitioner-appellant, v. John Gluch, Respondent-appellee, 831 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1987)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 831 F.2d 293 (6th Cir. 1987) October 6, 1987

ORDER

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN Jr. and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.


This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. The panel agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The district court judgment is reversed.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. $2254. Petitioner, who is currently on parole, was charged with various narcotics offenses. He was found guilty bya jury of conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He pled guilty to distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (1). He was sentenced to seven years for the conspiracy conviction with a five year special parole term. This sentence was later modified to eliminate the five year special parole term. For his conviction of distribution of heroin, he was sentenced to eighteen months with a four year special parole term to be served retroactively and concurrently with the previous seven year term. This sentence was subsequently reduced to eight months; however, this subsequent amendment made no mention of the four year special parole. Later, petitioner was informed in a letter by the court that the four year special parole term still applied.

Petitioner argues here that the Bureau of Prisons may not require him to serve the four year special parole term after completion of the seven year prison sentence. He argues that either this special parole term was served while he was incarcerated or the term was eliminated altogether by the trial judge's order reducing his sentence.

When the original sentence was reduced an error occurred. The letter from the court could not repair the error. Certainly petitioner can be required to complete the four year special parole after he completes his institutional sentence. This error may be corrected upon a resentencing.

The writ of habeas corpus is granted conditioned upon a failure to resentence within ninety days.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.