William H. Ferguson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael C. Samberg, Warden, Defendant-appellee, 831 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseWilliam H. Ferguson, appellant pro se.
William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying plaintiff's motion to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court, and deny the appellant's motion for stay of the proceedings. Ferguson v. Samberg, C/A No. 86-383-R (E.D. Va. July 24, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
