Gloria Werth; Steven Werth; Michael Werth, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Joseph H. Tashof; Wilda P. Tashof, Defendants-appellees, 829 F.2d 37 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseMichael W. Werth, for appellants.
Richard Harold Gins, Gins & Seebar, PC, for appellees.
Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon review of the record and the district court's opinion finding the challenged transfers voidable and finding the related debts dischargeable in bankruptcy, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Werth v. Tashof, C/A No. 85-2664-H, C/A No. 86-2152, (D. Md., Dec. 10, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
