Kelvin J. Miles, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Arnold Hopkins, Commissioner, Dennis Dusing, Defendant-appellees, 829 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseKelvin J. Miles, appellant pro se.
J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mark Disbrow McCurdy, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that these appeals from its denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are without merit. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court's refusal to reconsider its judgment or in its denial of injunctive relief and leave to file a supplemental complaint after entry of judgment. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, deny appellant's request for production and motions for injunctive relief, and affirm the judgments below on the reasoning of the district court. Miles v. Hopkins, C/A No. 86-609-S (D. Md., Dec. 5, 1986; Jan. 13, 1987).*
AFFIRMED.
On appeal, Miles contends that he has been denied access to the courts in violation of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). As this claim was not before the district court it is not properly before us on this appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
