Peter Kinard, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States Postal Service; Fred Crenshaw, Superintendentof Operation, Defendant-appellee, 829 F.2d 35 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CasePeter Kinard, Jr., appellant pro se.
James D. McCoy, III, Office of the United States Attorney, William T. Alvis, Office of Postal Rates and Mailing Rules, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing the 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Kinard v. United States Postal Service, C/A No. 86-1195 (D.S.C., Feb. 11, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
