United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Nathaniel Griffin, A/k/a 's', Defendant-appellant, 823 F.2d 549 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseJames Nathaniel Griffin, appellant pro se.
Paul Alexander Weinman, for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Griffin, C/A No. 86-522-D, CR No. 84-186-D (M.D.N.C., Dec. 9, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
