United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Miguel Angel Ramirez, Defendant-appellant, 822 F.2d 56 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore WIDENER, HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
Miguel Angel Ramirez, appellant pro se.
Kenneth Wayne McAllister, United States Attorney, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion denying appellant's motion for relief under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c) (3) (D) reveals that this appeal is without merit. The denial of relief is affirmed based upon the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ramirez, CR No. 81-14-7 (E.D.N.C., April 25, 1986). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
