Philip Landry, Petitioner-appellant, v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorneygeneral, State of Louisiana, Respondents-appellees, 822 F.2d 510 (5th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseMark McTernan, McTernan, Parr & Rumage, New Orleans, La., for petitioner-appellant.
Dorothy A. Pendergast, Asst. Dist. Atty., Research & Appeals, Gretna, La., for respondents-appellees.
Rene I. Salomon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Da's.
E. Pete Adams, Executive Director, La. Dist. Attys. Assoc., Inc., Baton Rouge, La., for amicus-Exec. Dir. La. Da's Assoc.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Patrick E. Carr, District Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion June 3, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987, 818 F.2d 1169)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
