Unpublished Dispositionhenry Roosevelt Jackson, Petitioner-appellant, v. Arthur Tate, Jr., Respondent-appellee, 817 F.2d 104 (6th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore KRUPANSKY and GUY, Circuit Judges, and GILMORE, District Judge.*
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of appellant's motion for appointment of counsel on appeal from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus (28 U.S.C. § 2254).
For the reasons stated by the district court in the memorandum opinion and order of September 2, 1986, the judgment is affirmed. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
The Honorable Horace W. Gilmore, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.