Unpublished Dispositionmardez Bradshaw, Plaintiff-appellant v. Lt. Harlan Edmonson, John Rees, Rebecca Cunningham, Robertkomer Jeanetta Lee, Eldon Cravins, and Linda Hall,defendants-appellees, 815 F.2d 701 (6th Cir. 1987)

Before KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, District Judge^* .

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiff's appeal from the district court's order dismissing his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter has been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9, Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the certified record and the parties' briefs, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Plaintiff alleges that his procedural due process rights were violated when defendants revoked his good-time credits without sufficient evidence and without providing him with a written statement of the evidence relied on and the reasons for the punishment.

Upon consideration, this Court affirms the district court's judgment pursuant to Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, as to all of plaintiffs' claims in this action in relation to his disciplinary proceedings. Due process requirements were met as required under Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974), Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution v. Hill, --- U.S. ---, 105 S. Ct. 2768 (1985), and King v. Wells, 760 F.2d 89 (6th Cir. 1985).